Australia and New Zealand vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Barley — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.6242 kt
in 2050
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
0.2267 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
4th
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
4th

Barley — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
00.20.40.6196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.6242 kt against 0.2267 kt in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 0.3975 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 2.8 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th of 106 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Iran (Islamic Republic of) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0693 kt 0.0604 kt 0.0089 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 0.1619 kt 0.0696 kt 0.0923 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.2095 kt 0.1286 kt 0.0808 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 0.27 kt 0.1462 kt 0.1238 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 0.3602 kt 0.126 kt 0.2341 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.4318 kt 0.1471 kt 0.2848 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.6013 kt 0.149 kt 0.4523 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 0.5455 kt 0.1927 kt 0.3528 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 0.6242 kt 0.2267 kt 0.3975 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 0.6242 kt against 0.2267 kt in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2050.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
0.3975 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank globally for barley — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 4th and Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th of 106 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Barley — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/iran-islamic-republic-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/iran-islamic-republic-of/">Australia and New Zealand vs Iran (Islamic Republic of): Barley — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
147 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).