Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
0.0132 kt
in 2050
Zimbabwe
0.015 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
44th
Zimbabwe rank
42nd

Beans, dry — Crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
00.010.020.03196120052050

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.015 kt against 0.0132 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.0018 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 127 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt 0.0057 kt 0.0054 kt Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0011 kt 0.0068 kt 0.0057 kt Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0045 kt 0.0101 kt 0.0057 kt Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0074 kt 0.0076 kt 0.0003 kt Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0087 kt 0.0072 kt 0.0015 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 0.0156 kt 0.0064 kt 0.0092 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 0.0295 kt 0.0072 kt 0.0222 kt Australia and New Zealand
2030s 0.0117 kt 0.0122 kt 0.0005 kt Zimbabwe
2050s 0.0132 kt 0.015 kt 0.0018 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.015 kt against 0.0132 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2050.
What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
0.0018 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 44th and Zimbabwe ranks 42nd of 127 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/zimbabwe/">Australia and New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Beans, dry — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
175 places, 9,358 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).