Cuba vs Yugoslav SFR: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Cuba
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 0.0333 kt against 0.0259 kt in Cuba, a difference of 0.0074 kt.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 28th of 127 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0088 kt | 0.0962 kt | 0.0874 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 0.0036 kt | 0.0321 kt | 0.0285 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 0.006 kt | 0.0288 kt | 0.0229 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 0.0066 kt | 0.0275 kt | 0.0209 kt | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Cuba or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 0.0333 kt against 0.0259 kt in Cuba as of 1991.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Cuba and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.0074 kt, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Cuba and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Cuba ranks 29th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 28th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).