Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Beans, dry — Crop residues

Sub-Saharan Africa
1.59 kt
in 2050
United Republic of Tanzania
0.3017 kt
in 2050
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
6th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
3rd

Beans, dry — Crop residues over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
00.511.52196120052050

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 1.59 kt against 0.3017 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.29 kt.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 5.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 32 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.299 kt 0.0332 kt 0.2658 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
1970s 0.4102 kt 0.0518 kt 0.3584 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
1980s 0.5098 kt 0.0716 kt 0.4382 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 0.6309 kt 0.0996 kt 0.5312 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 0.93 kt 0.1404 kt 0.7895 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 1.44 kt 0.2127 kt 1.23 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 1.75 kt 0.2229 kt 1.53 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2030s 1.24 kt 0.2157 kt 1.03 kt Sub-Saharan Africa
2050s 1.59 kt 0.3017 kt 1.29 kt Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Sub-Saharan Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 1.59 kt against 0.3017 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2050.
What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.29 kt, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 6th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 3rd of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Beans, dry — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/sub-saharan-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/beans-dry-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/sub-saharan-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Beans, dry — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beans, dry — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
175 places, 9,358 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).