Barbados vs Estonia: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Barbados
- Estonia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Estonia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 22 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 116th and Estonia ranks 116th of 127 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0022 kt | 0.0022 kt | Estonia |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Barbados or Estonia?
- Barbados, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Estonia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Barbados and Estonia?
- 0 kt, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Estonia?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2050.
- How do Barbados and Estonia rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Barbados ranks 116th and Estonia ranks 116th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).