Belgium-Luxembourg vs Sweden: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 39 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 105th and Sweden ranks 105th of 127 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sweden |
| 1970s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0 kt | Sweden |
| 1980s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Belgium-Luxembourg or Sweden?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0002 kt in Sweden as of 1999.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Belgium-Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Sweden?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Sweden rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 105th and Sweden ranks 105th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).