Belgium-Luxembourg vs Latvia: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 kt
in 1999
Latvia
0 kt
in 2050
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
105th
Latvia rank
105th
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 105th of 127 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Belgium-Luxembourg or Latvia?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Belgium-Luxembourg and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Latvia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Latvia rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 105th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).