Estonia vs Latvia: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Estonia
- Latvia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Estonia ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 105th of 127 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0012 kt | 0.0008 kt | Latvia |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Estonia or Latvia?
- Estonia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Estonia and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Latvia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Estonia and Latvia rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Estonia ranks 105th and Latvia ranks 105th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).