Latvia vs Puerto Rico: Beans, dry — Crop residues
Beans, dry — Crop residues over time
- Latvia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Latvia ranks 105th and Puerto Rico ranks 105th of 127 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0012 kt | 0 kt | 0.0012 kt | Latvia |
| 2030s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2050s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher beans, dry — crop residues, Latvia or Puerto Rico?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Puerto Rico as of 2050.
- What is the difference in beans, dry — crop residues between Latvia and Puerto Rico?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Puerto Rico?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
- How do Latvia and Puerto Rico rank globally for beans, dry — crop residues?
- Latvia ranks 105th and Puerto Rico ranks 105th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Beans, dry — Crop residues (Indirect emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).