Belarus vs Sudan: Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O)
Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belarus
- Sudan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.0133 kt against 0.0125 kt in Sudan, a difference of 0.0008 kt.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 120th and Sudan ranks 121st of 215 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0301 kt | 0.0119 kt | 0.0182 kt | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0.0352 kt | 0.0128 kt | 0.0224 kt | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher burning - crop residues — emissions, Belarus or Sudan?
- Belarus, at 0.0133 kt against 0.0125 kt in Sudan as of 2050.
- What is the difference in burning - crop residues — emissions between Belarus and Sudan?
- 0.0008 kt, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Sudan rank globally for burning - crop residues — emissions?
- Belarus ranks 120th and Sudan ranks 121st of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Burning - Crop residues — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf