Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre

Mozambique
10.95 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Solomon Islands
10.53 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Mozambique rank
189th
Solomon Islands rank
190th

Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Solomon Islands
051015196119922024

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 10.95 tonnes per square kilometre against 10.53 tonnes per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.42 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 189th and Solomon Islands ranks 190th of 204 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 3 and Solomon Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 2.89 tonnes per square kilometre 0.8727 tonnes per square kilometre 2.01 tonnes per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 3.85 tonnes per square kilometre 2.32 tonnes per square kilometre 1.53 tonnes per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 2.14 tonnes per square kilometre 5.09 tonnes per square kilometre 2.96 tonnes per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1990s 1.39 tonnes per square kilometre 6.58 tonnes per square kilometre 5.2 tonnes per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2000s 2.37 tonnes per square kilometre 9.83 tonnes per square kilometre 7.46 tonnes per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2010s 7.22 tonnes per square kilometre 11.44 tonnes per square kilometre 4.22 tonnes per square kilometre Solomon Islands
2020s 10.44 tonnes per square kilometre 10.3 tonnes per square kilometre 0.1396 tonnes per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre, Mozambique or Solomon Islands?
Mozambique, at 10.95 tonnes per square kilometre against 10.53 tonnes per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre between Mozambique and Solomon Islands?
0.42 tonnes per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Solomon Islands?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Mozambique and Solomon Islands rank globally for carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 189th and Solomon Islands ranks 190th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-income-level-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-dioxide-emissions-by-income-level-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/solomon-islands/">Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon dioxide emissions by income level, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 11,625 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide emissions by income level divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.