Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)

Burkina Faso
18,619 kt
in 2025
Zimbabwe
17,549 kt
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
23rd
Zimbabwe rank
24th

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020072025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 18,619 kt against 17,549 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,070 kt.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 223 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 28,996 kt 35,009 kt 6,013 kt Zimbabwe
2000s 21,277 kt 35,006 kt 13,729 kt Zimbabwe
2010s 18,618 kt 20,578 kt 1,959 kt Zimbabwe
2020s 18,591 kt 17,622 kt 969.17 kt Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2), Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Burkina Faso, at 18,619 kt against 17,549 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
1,070 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2)?
Burkina Faso ranks 23rd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).