Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)

Ecuador
12,210 kt
in 2025
Zimbabwe
17,549 kt
in 2025
Ecuador rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
24th

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Zimbabwe
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k35.0k199020072025

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17,549 kt against 12,210 kt in Ecuador, a difference of 5,339 kt.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 223 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 36,538 kt 35,009 kt 1,529 kt Ecuador
2000s 29,262 kt 35,006 kt 5,744 kt Zimbabwe
2010s 22,929 kt 20,578 kt 2,351 kt Ecuador
2020s 15,013 kt 17,622 kt 2,609 kt Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2), Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17,549 kt against 12,210 kt in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
5,339 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2)?
Ecuador ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/ecuador/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/ecuador/zimbabwe/">Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).