United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Uzbekistan: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
-1,613 kt
in 2025
Uzbekistan
-2,119 kt
in 2025
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
181st
Uzbekistan rank
184th

Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) over time

  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  • Uzbekistan
-15.0k-10.0k-5.0k0199020072025

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports -1,613 kt against -2,119 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 506 kt.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 181st and Uzbekistan ranks 184th of 223 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s -14,410 kt -502.33 kt 13,908 kt Uzbekistan
2000s -14,146 kt -499.03 kt 13,647 kt Uzbekistan
2010s -8,826 kt -610.13 kt 8,216 kt Uzbekistan
2020s -1,943 kt -1,883 kt 59.89 kt Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland or Uzbekistan?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at -1,613 kt against -2,119 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2) between United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Uzbekistan?
506 kt, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Uzbekistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Uzbekistan rank globally for carbon stock change in forests — net emissions/removals (co2)?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 181st and Uzbekistan ranks 184th of 223 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Uzbekistan: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-net-emissions-removals-co2-forest-land-fao-tier-1/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/uzbekistan/">United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland vs Uzbekistan: Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Net emissions/removals (CO2) (Forest land)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
275 places, 9,600 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Forests consists of CO2 emissions and removals corresponding to forest carbon stock changes (aboveground and belowground living biomass). Estimates are computed following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 2006).