Liechtenstein vs Nauru: Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure
Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure over time
- Liechtenstein
- Nauru
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 0.8 against 0.8 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 187th and Nauru ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8 | 0.85 | 0.05 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher climate-driven hazard & exposure, Liechtenstein or Nauru?
- Liechtenstein, at 0.8 against 0.8 in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in climate-driven hazard & exposure between Liechtenstein and Nauru?
- 0, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Nauru?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Liechtenstein and Nauru rank globally for climate-driven hazard & exposure?
- Liechtenstein ranks 187th and Nauru ranks 187th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.