Belgium vs Latvia: Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator
Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2.6 against 2.6 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 138th and Latvia ranks 138th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.11 | 2.49 | 0.3714 | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2.55 | 2.6 | 0.05 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher climate-driven inform risk indicator, Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 2.6 against 2.6 in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in climate-driven inform risk indicator between Belgium and Latvia?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for climate-driven inform risk indicator?
- Belgium ranks 138th and Latvia ranks 138th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.