Denmark vs Luxembourg: Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator
Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator over time
- Denmark
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 1.3 against 1 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.3.
That makes Denmark's figure about 1.3 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Denmark ranks 188th and Luxembourg ranks 189th of 191 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.4 | 1.09 | 0.3143 | Denmark |
| 2020s | 1.33 | 1.08 | 0.25 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher climate-driven inform risk indicator, Denmark or Luxembourg?
- Denmark, at 1.3 against 1 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in climate-driven inform risk indicator between Denmark and Luxembourg?
- 0.3, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Luxembourg?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Luxembourg rank globally for climate-driven inform risk indicator?
- Denmark ranks 188th and Luxembourg ranks 189th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.