Georgia vs Malaysia: Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator
Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator over time
- Georgia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 3.6 against 3.6 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 98th and Malaysia ranks 98th of 191 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.61 | 3.6 | 0.0143 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3.5 | 3.38 | 0.1167 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher climate-driven inform risk indicator, Georgia or Malaysia?
- Georgia, at 3.6 against 3.6 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in climate-driven inform risk indicator between Georgia and Malaysia?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Malaysia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Malaysia rank globally for climate-driven inform risk indicator?
- Georgia ranks 98th and Malaysia ranks 98th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on the Climate-driven INFORM Risk Indicator, which helps assess the risk of climate-driven hazards. It can be used to support decisions related to prevention, preparedness, and response. It has three dimensions: climate-driven hazard & exposure, vulnerability, and lack of coping capacity. It is produced based on the INFORM Risk with IMF staff calculations. Climate-driven Hazard & Exposure reflects the probability of physical exposure associated with specific climate-driven hazards. Vulnerability represents economic, political and social characteristics of the community that can be destabilized in case of a hazard event. Lack of coping capacity relates to the ability of a country to cope with disasters in terms of formal, organized activities and the effort of the country’s government as well as the existing infrastructure which contribute to the reduction of disaster risk. The data are updated annually based on August data release by INFORM Risk.