Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
993,274 ha
in 2024
South Africa
195,367 ha
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
10th
South Africa rank
7th

Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • South Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M199020072024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 993,274 ha against 195,367 ha in South Africa, a difference of 797,907 ha.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.1 times South Africa's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 2.71 million ha 484,204 ha 2.23 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 2.11 million ha 305,941 ha 1.80 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 2.35 million ha 298,225 ha 2.05 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.53 million ha 641,516 ha 2.89 million ha Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed and open shrubland — burned area, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or South Africa?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 993,274 ha against 195,367 ha in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in closed and open shrubland — burned area between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
797,907 ha, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and South Africa rank globally for closed and open shrubland — burned area?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 10th and South Africa ranks 7th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-and-open-shrubland-burned-area-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/south-africa/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs South Africa: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area
Unit
ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
271 places, 9,259 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.