Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Bahamas
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Costa Rica
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Bahamas rank
29th
Costa Rica rank
29th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Bahamas
  • Costa Rica
-2000200400199120032016

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Bahamas ranks 29th and Costa Rica ranks 29th of 135 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 46.65 % change on previous year 18.52 % change on previous year 28.13 % change on previous year Bahamas
2000s -75.81 % change on previous year 175 % change on previous year 250.81 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Bahamas or Costa Rica?
Bahamas, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Costa Rica as of 2016.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Bahamas and Costa Rica?
0 % change on previous year, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Costa Rica?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Bahamas and Costa Rica rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Bahamas ranks 29th and Costa Rica ranks 29th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/costa-rica/">Bahamas vs Costa Rica: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 3,334 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.