Bahamas vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Bahamas
-100 % change on previous year
in 2016
Eswatini
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Bahamas rank
29th
Eswatini rank
29th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
-2000200400199120052020

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bahamas ranks 29th and Eswatini ranks 29th of 135 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 46.65 % change on previous year 20.31 % change on previous year 26.34 % change on previous year Bahamas
2000s 9.68 % change on previous year 53.31 % change on previous year 43.63 % change on previous year Eswatini
2010s -62.5 % change on previous year -75 % change on previous year 12.5 % change on previous year Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Bahamas, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2016.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Bahamas and Eswatini?
0 % change on previous year, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
18 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2016.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Bahamas ranks 29th and Eswatini ranks 29th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 3,334 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.