El Salvador vs New Caledonia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
El Salvador
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
New Caledonia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
El Salvador rank
29th
New Caledonia rank
29th
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- El Salvador
- New Caledonia
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 7 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 29th of 135 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, El Salvador or New Caledonia?
- El Salvador, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Caledonia as of 2001.
- What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between El Salvador and New Caledonia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1997.
- How do El Salvador and New Caledonia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 29th of 135 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.