Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Tunisia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
29th
Tunisia rank
29th

Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tunisia
-2000200400600199120072024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tunisia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tunisia ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 29th of 135 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 56.81 % change on previous year 35.74 % change on previous year 21.07 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2000s -57.14 % change on previous year -75 % change on previous year 17.86 % change on previous year Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
Sri Lanka, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Tunisia as of 2001.
What is the difference in closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
0 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for closed shrubland — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Sri Lanka ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 29th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sri-lanka/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/closed-shrubland-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sri-lanka/tunisia/">Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 3,334 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Closed shrubland — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.