Iceland vs Malta: Co2 by source
Iceland
13,113
in 2024
Malta
403
in 2024
Iceland rank
43rd
Malta rank
45th
Co2 by source over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 13,113 against 403 in Malta, a difference of 12,710.
That makes Iceland's figure about 32.5 times Malta's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 43rd and Malta ranks 45th of 46 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7,459 | 1,638 | 5,821 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 9,819 | 485.9 | 9,333 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 11,072 | 1,560 | 9,512 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 12,654 | 522.6 | 12,132 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher co2 by source, Iceland or Malta?
- Iceland, at 13,113 against 403 in Malta as of 2024.
- What is the difference in co2 by source between Iceland and Malta?
- 12,710, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for co2 by source?
- Iceland ranks 43rd and Malta ranks 45th of 46 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Co2 by source. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.