Czechia vs Ecuador: Co2 land use per capita

Czechia
-0.5292
in 2024
Ecuador
-0.6714
in 2024
Czechia rank
174th
Ecuador rank
177th

Co2 land use per capita over time

  • Czechia
  • Ecuador
0102030185019372024

How they compare

Czechia currently reports -0.5292 against -0.6714 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1422.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Ecuador ahead.

Czechia ranks 174th and Ecuador ranks 177th of 194 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Ecuador Difference Ahead
1850s 1.49 8.4 6.91 Ecuador
1860s 1.48 8 6.52 Ecuador
1870s 1.29 9.69 8.4 Ecuador
1880s 0.8877 7.44 6.55 Ecuador
1890s 0.9588 7.37 6.42 Ecuador
1900s 1.04 9.77 8.73 Ecuador
1910s 0.2692 7.7 7.43 Ecuador
1920s 0.0884 5.93 5.84 Ecuador
1930s -0.7169 22.23 22.94 Ecuador
1940s -1.69 16.22 17.91 Ecuador
1950s -1.08 15.21 16.29 Ecuador
1960s -0.831 8.35 9.18 Ecuador
1970s -0.8576 7.36 8.22 Ecuador
1980s -0.6255 7.24 7.87 Ecuador
1990s -0.4581 3.29 3.75 Ecuador
2000s -1.14 1.11 2.25 Ecuador
2010s -0.6189 1.43 2.05 Ecuador
2020s -0.535 0.0614 0.5964 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher co2 land use per capita, Czechia or Ecuador?
Czechia, at -0.5292 against -0.6714 in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in co2 land use per capita between Czechia and Ecuador?
0.1422, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Ecuador?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Ecuador rank globally for co2 land use per capita?
Czechia ranks 174th and Ecuador ranks 177th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Co2 land use per capita
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
194 places, 33,660 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed