Co2 land use per capita in Ecuador
Ecuador: Co2 land use per capita was -0.6714 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-0.6714
Change on year
down 2.0%
World rank
177th
of 194 countries
All-time high
28.92
in 1934
All-time low
-0.6714
in 2024
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Ecuador, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 land use per capita in Ecuador is -0.6714, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 175 years on record.
That represents a change of down 2.0% on the previous year and down 115.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Ecuador peaked at 28.92 in 1934 and was at its lowest, -0.6714, in 2024.
Ecuador ranks 177th of 194 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 9.11 | — |
| 1851 | 7.4 | -18.7% |
| 1852 | 7.97 | +7.7% |
| 1853 | 7.65 | -4.0% |
| 1854 | 8.81 | +15.2% |
| 1855 | 9.05 | +2.8% |
| 1856 | 7.08 | -21.8% |
| 1857 | 9.55 | +34.9% |
| 1858 | 8.04 | -15.8% |
| 1859 | 9.37 | +16.5% |
| 1860 | 9.55 | +1.9% |
| 1861 | 7.14 | -25.3% |
| 1862 | 12.19 | +70.8% |
| 1863 | 6.3 | -48.3% |
| 1864 | 6.94 | +10.1% |
| 1865 | 6.38 | -8.2% |
| 1866 | 8.11 | +27.2% |
| 1867 | 7.66 | -5.6% |
| 1868 | 5.56 | -27.3% |
| 1869 | 10.13 | +82.1% |
| 1870 | 3.84 | -62.1% |
| 1871 | 10.17 | +165.0% |
| 1872 | 13.07 | +28.4% |
| 1873 | 8.18 | -37.4% |
| 1874 | 9.53 | +16.5% |
| 1875 | 7.16 | -24.8% |
| 1876 | 7.68 | +7.2% |
| 1877 | 15.36 | +100.1% |
| 1878 | 14.55 | -5.3% |
| 1879 | 7.41 | -49.1% |
| 1880 | 8.24 | +11.2% |
| 1881 | 5.89 | -28.4% |
| 1882 | 5.85 | -0.7% |
| 1883 | 6.07 | +3.7% |
| 1884 | 11.38 | +87.4% |
| 1885 | 7.21 | -36.6% |
| 1886 | 7.38 | +2.3% |
| 1887 | 8.78 | +19.1% |
| 1888 | 7 | -20.3% |
| 1889 | 6.61 | -5.5% |
| 1890 | 14.17 | +114.3% |
| 1891 | 7.6 | -46.4% |
| 1892 | 5.49 | -27.7% |
| 1893 | 5.7 | +3.7% |
| 1894 | 5.96 | +4.6% |
| 1895 | 8.51 | +42.7% |
| 1896 | 5.09 | -40.2% |
| 1897 | 7.51 | +47.7% |
| 1898 | 7.06 | -6.0% |
| 1899 | 6.66 | -5.6% |
| 1900 | 7.51 | +12.7% |
| 1901 | 9.04 | +20.3% |
| 1902 | 9.3 | +2.9% |
| 1903 | 12.86 | +38.3% |
| 1904 | 9.64 | -25.1% |
| 1905 | 10.73 | +11.3% |
| 1906 | 11.5 | +7.2% |
| 1907 | 6.75 | -41.3% |
| 1908 | 10.59 | +57.0% |
| 1909 | 9.83 | -7.2% |
| 1910 | 10.63 | +8.2% |
| 1911 | 8.35 | -21.5% |
| 1912 | 4.33 | -48.2% |
| 1913 | 8.01 | +85.2% |
| 1914 | 6.31 | -21.2% |
| 1915 | 7.99 | +26.6% |
| 1916 | 8.99 | +12.4% |
| 1917 | 7.06 | -21.4% |
| 1918 | 6.9 | -2.3% |
| 1919 | 8.44 | +22.4% |
| 1920 | 8.03 | -4.9% |
| 1921 | 9.01 | +12.2% |
| 1922 | 2 | -77.8% |
| 1923 | 6.89 | +244.0% |
| 1924 | 6.89 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 2.78 | -59.7% |
| 1926 | 8.79 | +216.7% |
| 1927 | 4.26 | -51.5% |
| 1928 | 8.46 | +98.4% |
| 1929 | 2.15 | -74.6% |
| 1930 | 12.1 | +462.5% |
| 1931 | 17.41 | +44.0% |
| 1932 | 21.19 | +21.7% |
| 1933 | 22.57 | +6.5% |
| 1934 | 28.92 | +28.1% |
| 1935 | 24.98 | -13.6% |
| 1936 | 23.06 | -7.7% |
| 1937 | 26.49 | +14.9% |
| 1938 | 23.66 | -10.7% |
| 1939 | 21.9 | -7.4% |
| 1940 | 19.16 | -12.5% |
| 1941 | 17.68 | -7.7% |
| 1942 | 19.18 | +8.5% |
| 1943 | 17.06 | -11.0% |
| 1944 | 15.18 | -11.0% |
| 1945 | 16.77 | +10.4% |
| 1946 | 13.98 | -16.6% |
| 1947 | 14.87 | +6.3% |
| 1948 | 14.6 | -1.8% |
| 1949 | 13.72 | -6.1% |
| 1950 | 14.35 | +4.6% |
| 1951 | 16.23 | +13.1% |
| 1952 | 15.47 | -4.6% |
| 1953 | 15.36 | -0.8% |
| 1954 | 16.37 | +6.6% |
| 1955 | 16.11 | -1.6% |
| 1956 | 13.79 | -14.4% |
| 1957 | 15.12 | +9.7% |
| 1958 | 15.04 | -0.6% |
| 1959 | 14.24 | -5.3% |
| 1960 | 22.71 | +59.4% |
| 1961 | 11.79 | -48.1% |
| 1962 | 9.52 | -19.2% |
| 1963 | 7.69 | -19.2% |
| 1964 | 7.5 | -2.6% |
| 1965 | 5.49 | -26.7% |
| 1966 | 3.59 | -34.6% |
| 1967 | 2.99 | -16.7% |
| 1968 | 6.95 | +132.2% |
| 1969 | 5.22 | -24.9% |
| 1970 | 6.46 | +23.8% |
| 1971 | 5.8 | -10.2% |
| 1972 | 4.59 | -20.9% |
| 1973 | 7.73 | +68.5% |
| 1974 | 7.91 | +2.3% |
| 1975 | 8.13 | +2.8% |
| 1976 | 9.69 | +19.3% |
| 1977 | 7.19 | -25.9% |
| 1978 | 7.16 | -0.4% |
| 1979 | 8.95 | +25.1% |
| 1980 | 11.12 | +24.2% |
| 1981 | 9.57 | -13.9% |
| 1982 | 6.29 | -34.3% |
| 1983 | 8.44 | +34.2% |
| 1984 | 10.22 | +21.0% |
| 1985 | 8.28 | -19.0% |
| 1986 | 6.33 | -23.5% |
| 1987 | 4.57 | -27.9% |
| 1988 | 2.87 | -37.2% |
| 1989 | 4.75 | +65.7% |
| 1990 | 5.88 | +23.6% |
| 1991 | 3.78 | -35.7% |
| 1992 | 3 | -20.7% |
| 1993 | 5.06 | +68.8% |
| 1994 | 2.88 | -43.1% |
| 1995 | 2.18 | -24.2% |
| 1996 | 1.78 | -18.4% |
| 1997 | 3.16 | +77.5% |
| 1998 | 2.81 | -11.1% |
| 1999 | 2.44 | -13.1% |
| 2000 | 1.01 | -58.7% |
| 2001 | 0.2838 | -71.8% |
| 2002 | -0.1371 | -148.3% |
| 2003 | 4.83 | -3624.0% |
| 2004 | 0.9027 | -81.3% |
| 2005 | 0.3353 | -62.9% |
| 2006 | 0.3551 | +5.9% |
| 2007 | 1.75 | +394.2% |
| 2008 | 1.22 | -30.6% |
| 2009 | 0.5726 | -53.0% |
| 2010 | 0.5311 | -7.3% |
| 2011 | 2.06 | +288.0% |
| 2012 | 0.5592 | -72.9% |
| 2013 | 0.6888 | +23.2% |
| 2014 | 4.35 | +531.2% |
| 2015 | 1.1 | -74.7% |
| 2016 | 1.06 | -4.0% |
| 2017 | 0.6156 | -41.7% |
| 2018 | 1.85 | +200.9% |
| 2019 | 1.51 | -18.4% |
| 2020 | 0.7171 | -52.5% |
| 2021 | 0.5065 | -29.4% |
| 2022 | 0.4133 | -18.4% |
| 2023 | -0.6584 | -259.3% |
| 2024 | -0.6714 | +2.0% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -0.6714 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0027. (58 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's -0.6714 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0312. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 land use per capita in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | +3624.0% | -0.1371 | 4.83 |
| 2014 | +531.2% | 0.6888 | 4.35 |
| 1930 | +462.5% | 2.15 | 12.1 |
| 2007 | +394.2% | 0.3551 | 1.75 |
| 2011 | +288.0% | 0.5311 | 2.06 |
| 2023 | -259.3% | 0.4133 | -0.6584 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 8.4 | 7.08 | 9.55 | 10 |
| 1860s | 8 | 5.56 | 12.19 | 10 |
| 1870s | 9.69 | 3.84 | 15.36 | 10 |
| 1880s | 7.44 | 5.85 | 11.38 | 10 |
| 1890s | 7.37 | 5.09 | 14.17 | 10 |
| 1900s | 9.77 | 6.75 | 12.86 | 10 |
| 1910s | 7.7 | 4.33 | 10.63 | 10 |
| 1920s | 5.93 | 2 | 9.01 | 10 |
| 1930s | 22.23 | 12.1 | 28.92 | 10 |
| 1940s | 16.22 | 13.72 | 19.18 | 10 |
| 1950s | 15.21 | 13.79 | 16.37 | 10 |
| 1960s | 8.35 | 2.99 | 22.71 | 10 |
| 1970s | 7.36 | 4.59 | 9.69 | 10 |
| 1980s | 7.24 | 2.87 | 11.12 | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.29 | 1.78 | 5.88 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.11 | -0.1371 | 4.83 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.43 | 0.5311 | 4.35 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0614 | -0.6714 | 0.7171 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Ecuador?
- Co2 land use per capita in Ecuador was -0.6714 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 28.92 in 1934.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6714 in 2024.
- How does Ecuador rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 177th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 115.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).