Europe vs Kazakhstan: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Europe
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Europe currently reports 4,043 kt against 1,250 kt in Kazakhstan, a difference of 2,793 kt.
That makes Europe's figure about 3.2 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Europe has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 25 groups.
Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,274 kt | 1,700 kt | 6,573 kt | Europe |
| 2010s | 7,935 kt | 1,303 kt | 6,631 kt | Europe |
| 2020s | 4,901 kt | 968.02 kt | 3,933 kt | Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Europe or Kazakhstan?
- Europe, at 4,043 kt against 1,250 kt in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Europe and Kazakhstan?
- 2,793 kt, with Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Kazakhstan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Kazakhstan rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Europe ranks 5th and Kazakhstan ranks 5th of 25 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.