Europe vs Zimbabwe: Coal — Emissions
Coal — Emissions over time
- Europe
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Europe currently reports 4,043 kt against 229.25 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,814 kt.
That makes Europe's figure about 17.6 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Europe has been ahead every year.
Europe ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 25 groups.
Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,169 kt | 2,184 kt | 5,985 kt | Europe |
| 2010s | 7,935 kt | 396.89 kt | 7,538 kt | Europe |
| 2020s | 4,901 kt | 216.75 kt | 4,684 kt | Europe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal — emissions, Europe or Zimbabwe?
- Europe, at 4,043 kt against 229.25 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal — emissions between Europe and Zimbabwe?
- 3,814 kt, with Europe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Europe and Zimbabwe rank globally for coal — emissions?
- Europe ranks 5th and Zimbabwe ranks 7th of 25 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Coal — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Energy use in agriculture contains data on energy used in agriculture (including forestry, aquaculture and fisheries), for instance to operate machinery, irrigate, heat stables, operate aquaculture ponds and fishing vessels, and related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It also includes on-farm use of, and related GHG emissions from, electricity and heat generated off-farm. Data are available by country and regional groups with global coverage and are updated annually.