Azerbaijan vs Pre-demographic dividend: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low)
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Pre-demographic dividend
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 3.1 1=low to 6=high against 2.72 1=low to 6=high in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.38 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 36th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 35th of 85 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Pre-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 0.3233 1=low to 6=high | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 2.86 1=low to 6=high | 0.2364 1=low to 6=high | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Azerbaijan or Pre-demographic dividend?
- Azerbaijan, at 3.1 1=low to 6=high against 2.72 1=low to 6=high in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2010.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Azerbaijan and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 0.38 1=low to 6=high, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Azerbaijan ranks 36th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 35th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.