CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) by country

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for...

Countries reporting
85
Highest
4.1 1=low to 6=high
Bhutan
Lowest
1.2 1=low to 6=high
Sudan
Median
3.1 1=low to 6=high
Years covered
21
2005–2025
Data points
2,460

What the numbers show

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) is currently reported for 85 countries. The highest value is 4.1 1=low to 6=high in Bhutan; the lowest is 1.2 1=low to 6=high in Sudan.

The median across all reporting countries is 3.1 1=low to 6=high, and the mean is 2.98 1=low to 6=high.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 3.

Over the past decade 27 countries rose and 46 fell. The largest increase was in Togo (up 26.9%), and the largest decrease in Sudan (down 45.5%).

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Bhutan 4.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.9% rising
2 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
2 Georgia 4 1=low to 6=high 2013 up 11.1% rising
2 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 2.4% flat
5 Rwanda 3.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 5.4% rising
6 Cote d'Ivoire 3.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 22.6% rising
7 Armenia 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 2.6% flat
7 Benin 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.1% rising
7 Ghana 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
7 Kenya 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 8.8% rising
7 Saint Lucia 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
7 Tonga 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged rising
7 Uzbekistan 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 15.6% rising
7 Kosovo 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.1% rising
7 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.1% rising
16 India 3.6 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 2.7% flat
17 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 2.8% flat
17 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.4% flat
17 Vietnam 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2015 unchanged flat
20 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 2.9% falling
20 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
20 Mauritania 3.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.2% rising
23 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 5.7% falling
23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2013 unchanged flat
23 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 13.2% falling
23 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.1% flat
23 Moldova 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2019 down 2.9% flat
23 Mongolia 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2019 down 2.9% flat
23 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 26.9% rising
23 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.5% flat
31 Gambia 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 10.3% rising
31 Guyana 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.2% flat
31 Pakistan 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.2% flat
31 Tuvalu 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
31 Tanzania 3.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.0% falling
36 Azerbaijan 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2010 down 3.1% flat
36 Bolivia 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2015 down 6.1% falling
36 Ethiopia 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 11.4% flat
36 Kyrgyzstan 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.1% rising
36 Kiribati 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.1% flat
36 Maldives 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
36 Tajikistan 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 6.9% rising
36 Vanuatu 3.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.1% flat
44 Cameroon 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.4% flat
44 Djibouti 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 11.1% rising
44 Guinea 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.1% rising
44 Malawi 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.2% falling
44 Sierra Leone 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.2% rising
44 Zambia 3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.2% falling
50 Micronesia (country) 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
50 Honduras 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.5% falling
50 Cambodia 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 7.4% flat
50 Lesotho 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.1% falling
50 Zimbabwe 2.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.6% rising
55 Congo 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 12.0% flat
55 Laos 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.7% flat
55 Mozambique 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
55 Niger 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 12.5% falling
55 Nepal 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.7% falling
55 Solomon Islands 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 3.7% rising
55 Sao Tome and Principe 2.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 9.7% flat
62 Marshall Islands 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.6% flat
62 Nigeria 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.6% falling
62 Papua New Guinea 2.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 6.9% falling
65 Democratic Republic of Congo 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.0% rising
65 Liberia 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 10.3% falling
65 Madagascar 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.7% falling
65 Chad 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 3.7% rising
65 East Timor 2.6 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 4.0% flat
70 Bangladesh 2.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 13.8% falling
71 Burundi 2.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 4.0% falling
71 Central African Republic 2.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 up 9.1% flat
73 Angola 2.3 1=low to 6=high 2013 down 4.2% falling
73 Mali 2.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 23.3% falling
75 Guinea-Bissau 2.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged falling
75 Nicaragua 2.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 33.3% falling
77 Comoros 2.1 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 19.2% flat
78 Haiti 1.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 20.8% falling
78 Myanmar 1.9 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 36.7% falling
80 Somalia 1.8 1=low to 6=high 2025 unchanged flat
81 Afghanistan 1.7 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 32.0% falling
82 Eritrea 1.5 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 40.0% falling
83 Yemen 1.4 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 41.7% falling
84 South Sudan 1.3 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 23.5% falling
85 Sudan 1.2 1=low to 6=high 2025 down 45.5% falling

Regions and income groups

Aggregates are excluded from the country ranking above so that a region can never outrank a country.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average by country. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/">CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.