CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Kiribati
Kiribati: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kiribati, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Kiribati recorded 3.1 1=low to 6=high for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 21 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kiribati peaked at 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.1 1=low to 6=high, in 2008.
Kiribati ranks 36th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Kiribati, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | -3.0% |
| 2007 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -3.1% |
| 2009 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +6.5% |
| 2012 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | -3.0% |
| 2013 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2020 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | -3.0% |
| 2023 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -3.1% |
| 2025 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Kiribati compared with similar countries
- Kiribati's 3.1 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
- Kiribati's 3.1 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.21 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kiribati
- 36 Azerbaijan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Bolivia 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Ethiopia 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Kyrgyzstan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Maldives 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Tajikistan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
- 36 Vanuatu 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Kiribati
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 0 kg (2023)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 20.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 7.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 12.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.0288 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.4434 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 0 kt (2023)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 0 kt (2023)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0 kt (2023)
- Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq) 0 kt (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kiribati?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kiribati was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Kiribati?
- The highest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Kiribati?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2008.
- How does Kiribati rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Kiribati ranks 36th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Kiribati?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kiribati data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.