CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Bolivia

Bolivia: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2015. ▼ Falling

Latest (2015)
3.1 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
down 3.1%
World rank
36th
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.3 1=low to 6=high
in 2005
All-time low
3.1 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
Years of data
11
2005–2015

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bolivia, 2005–2015

01232005201020152005: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.1 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Bolivia recorded 3.1 1=low to 6=high for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in 2015. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.1% on the previous year and down 6.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bolivia peaked at 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.1 1=low to 6=high, in 2015.

Bolivia ranks 36th of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Bolivia, year by year

Annual values for CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Bolivia, 2005 to 2015.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2008 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2009 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2010 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.2 1=low to 6=high -3.0%
2012 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2013 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.2 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2015 3.1 1=low to 6=high -3.1%

Bolivia compared with similar countries

  • Bolivia's 3.1 1=low to 6=high is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.0× the median. (39 countries reporting)
  • Bolivia's 3.1 1=low to 6=high is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 3.2 1=low to 6=high, 97% of the median. (9 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.3 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.1 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Bolivia

  1. 36 Azerbaijan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 36 Ethiopia 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 36 Kiribati 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 36 Kyrgyzstan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 36 Maldives 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 36 Tajikistan 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 36 Vanuatu 3.1 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More climate change data for Bolivia

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bolivia?
Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bolivia was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2015, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Bolivia?
The highest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Bolivia?
The lowest recorded value was 3.1 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
How does Bolivia rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
Bolivia ranks 36th out of 85 countries with data for 2015.
Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Bolivia?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bolivia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/bolivia/">CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bolivia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.