CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar

Myanmar: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 1.9 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
1.9 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
77th
of 84 countries
All-time high
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
All-time low
1.9 1=low to 6=high
in 2022
Years of data
13
2013–2025

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar, 2013–2025

01232013201920252013: 2.7 1=low to 6=high2014: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2015: 3 1=low to 6=high2016: 3 1=low to 6=high2017: 2.9 1=low to 6=high2018: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2019: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2020: 2.8 1=low to 6=high2021: 2 1=low to 6=high2022: 1.9 1=low to 6=high2023: 1.9 1=low to 6=high2024: 1.9 1=low to 6=high2025: 1.9 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar is 1.9 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.

That represents a change of down 36.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar peaked at 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015 and was at its lowest, 1.9 1=low to 6=high, in 2022.

That places Myanmar 77th out of 84 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar, year by year

Annual values for CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Myanmar, 2013 to 2025.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2013 2.7 1=low to 6=high
2014 2.9 1=low to 6=high +7.4%
2015 3 1=low to 6=high +3.4%
2016 3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2017 2.9 1=low to 6=high -3.3%
2018 2.8 1=low to 6=high -3.4%
2019 2.8 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2020 2.8 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2021 2 1=low to 6=high -28.6%
2022 1.9 1=low to 6=high -5.0%
2023 1.9 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2024 1.9 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2025 1.9 1=low to 6=high +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 2.87 1=low to 6=high 2.7 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 7
2020s 2.07 1=low to 6=high 1.9 1=low to 6=high 2.8 1=low to 6=high 6

Countries ranked near Myanmar

  1. 74 Guinea-Bissau 2.2 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 74 Nicaragua 2.2 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 76 Comoros 2.1 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 77 Haiti 1.9 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 79 Somalia 1.8 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 80 Afghanistan 1.7 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 126 places →

More climate change data for Myanmar

All data for Myanmar →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar?
Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar was 1.9 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Myanmar?
The highest recorded value was 3 1=low to 6=high in 2015.
What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Myanmar?
The lowest recorded value was 1.9 1=low to 6=high in 2022.
How does Myanmar rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
Myanmar ranks 77th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Myanmar?
Over the last ten years it is down 36.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Myanmar data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/myanmar/">CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Myanmar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
126 places, 2,443 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.