CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 2.98 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
In 2025, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) stood at 2.98 1=low to 6=high.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and down 4.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 3.22 1=low to 6=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 2.97 1=low to 6=high, in 2022.
That places East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) 21st out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | -1.8% |
| 2007 | 3.04 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2008 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | +2.7% |
| 2009 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | +2.0% |
| 2011 | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | -1.3% |
| 2012 | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | -0.6% |
| 2013 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -1.2% |
| 2014 | 3.13 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 3.13 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2016 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2017 | 3.09 1=low to 6=high | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 3.06 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2019 | 3.04 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2020 | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2021 | 2.99 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2022 | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2023 | 2.98 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2024 | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | -0.2% |
| 2025 | 2.98 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.04 1=low to 6=high | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.99 1=low to 6=high | 2.97 1=low to 6=high | 3.02 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 20 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 20 Mauritania 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 20 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Republic of Moldova 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Mongolia 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Population growth 0.1% (2025)
- Population, total 2.12 billion (2025)
- Urban population growth 0.8% (2025)
- Urban population 1.31 billion (2025)
- Urban population 62.0% (2025)
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total 1,073 billion cubic meters (2022)
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total 12.4% (2022)
- Terrestrial protected areas 15.0% (2025)
- Terrestrial and marine protected areas 8.6% (2025)
- Marine protected areas 4.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) was 2.98 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.22 1=low to 6=high in 2010.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.97 1=low to 6=high in 2022.
- How does East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 21st out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.