East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Mongolia: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average over time
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 3.3 1=low to 6=high against 2.98 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.32 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 42 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 0.2568 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 0.2268 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 3.3 1=low to 6=high against 2.98 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Mongolia?
- 0.32 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Mongolia rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 21st and Mongolia ranks 23rd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.