CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Mongolia

Mongolia: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
3.3 1=low to 6=high
Change on year
up 3.1%
World rank
23rd
of 85 countries
All-time high
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2011
All-time low
3.2 1=low to 6=high
in 2018
Years of data
15
2005–2019

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mongolia, 2005–2019

012342005201220192005: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2006: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2007: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2008: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2009: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2010: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2011: 3.5 1=low to 6=high2012: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2013: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2014: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2015: 3.4 1=low to 6=high2016: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2017: 3.3 1=low to 6=high2018: 3.2 1=low to 6=high2019: 3.3 1=low to 6=high

Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.

Analysis

Mongolia recorded 3.3 1=low to 6=high for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in 2019.

That represents a change of up 3.1% on the previous year and down 2.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mongolia peaked at 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011 and was at its lowest, 3.2 1=low to 6=high, in 2018.

That places Mongolia 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high) in Mongolia, 2005 to 2019.
Year 1=low to 6=high Change
2005 3.3 1=low to 6=high —
2006 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2007 3.4 1=low to 6=high +3.0%
2008 3.3 1=low to 6=high -2.9%
2009 3.4 1=low to 6=high +3.0%
2010 3.4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2011 3.5 1=low to 6=high +2.9%
2012 3.4 1=low to 6=high -2.9%
2013 3.4 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2014 3.3 1=low to 6=high -2.9%
2015 3.4 1=low to 6=high +3.0%
2016 3.3 1=low to 6=high -2.9%
2017 3.3 1=low to 6=high +0.0%
2018 3.2 1=low to 6=high -3.0%
2019 3.3 1=low to 6=high +3.1%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 3.3 1=low to 6=high is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.4 1=low to 6=high, 97% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
  • Mongolia's 3.3 1=low to 6=high is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 3 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 3.34 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 3.4 1=low to 6=high 5
2010s 3.35 1=low to 6=high 3.2 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 10

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 20 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
  2. 20 Mauritania 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
  3. 20 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
  4. 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
  5. 23 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
  6. 23 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
  7. 23 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high
  8. 23 Moldova 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
  9. 23 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
  10. 23 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare

See the full ranking of 127 places →

More climate change data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mongolia?
Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mongolia was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 3.5 1=low to 6=high in 2011.
What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 3.2 1=low to 6=high in 2018.
How does Mongolia rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
Mongolia ranks 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2019.
Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 06 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/cpia-public-sector-management-and-institutions-cluster-average-1-low-to-6-high/mongolia/">CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.