CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania
Mauritania: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania is 3.4 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is up 6.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania peaked at 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2023 and was at its lowest, 2.9 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Mauritania ranks 19th of 84 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +3.4% |
| 2008 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +3.3% |
| 2013 | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +3.2% |
| 2015 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2017 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | -3.0% |
| 2021 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2022 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +3.0% |
| 2024 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.96 1=low to 6=high | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Mauritania
- 16 Senegal 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 16 Viet Nam 3.5 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Republic of Moldova 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Mongolia 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Mauritania
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 13,025 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,939 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,086 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 14.87 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 324.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 339.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 60.39 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 279.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2279 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 9.97 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Mauritania was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Mauritania?
- The highest recorded value was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2023.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Mauritania?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.9 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Mauritania rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Mauritania ranks 19th out of 84 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Mauritania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Mauritania data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.