CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bosnia and Herzegovina: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2013. ▬ Flat
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2005–2013
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina is 3.3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2013. That is the lowest value across all 9 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina peaked at 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.3 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +3.0% |
| 2007 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2008 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 20 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 20 Mauritania 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 20 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high
- 23 Republic of Moldova 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Mongolia 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 23 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 38.48 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,553 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 578.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,974 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 2.18 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 70.49 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 317.19 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 299.82 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 17.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.13 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Bosnia and Herzegovina was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2013, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The highest recorded value was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Bosnia and Herzegovina rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2013.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Bosnia and Herzegovina data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.