CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Republic of Moldova
Republic of Moldova: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Republic of Moldova, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Republic of Moldova recorded 3.3 1=low to 6=high for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in 2019.
That represents a change of down 2.9% on the previous year and down 2.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Republic of Moldova peaked at 3.6 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 3.2 1=low to 6=high, in 2005.
Republic of Moldova ranks 22nd of 84 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Republic of Moldova, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +6.2% |
| 2008 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +2.9% |
| 2009 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2010 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +2.9% |
| 2012 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | +2.9% |
| 2014 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | -2.8% |
| 2015 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2016 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova
- 19 Grenada 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Mauritania 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 19 Sri Lanka 3.4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Burkina Faso 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Dominica 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Fiji 3.3 1=low to 6=high
- 22 Mongolia 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Togo 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
- 22 Uganda 3.3 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Republic of Moldova
- Share co2 vs population 0.0146 (2100)
- Urban population 43.7% (2025)
- Urban population 1.03 million (2025)
- Urban population growth -1.3% (2025)
- Population, total 2.36 million (2025)
- Population growth -1.8% (2025)
- Annual Net Emissions/Removals 12.99 (2024)
- Temperature change with respect to a baseline climatology 3.32 (2024)
- Per capita CO₂ emissions vs. per capita energy use 1.76 tonnes per person (2024)
- Share global cumulative co2 including land 0.0522 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Republic of Moldova?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Republic of Moldova was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The highest recorded value was 3.6 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Republic of Moldova?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.2 1=low to 6=high in 2005.
- How does Republic of Moldova rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 22nd out of 84 countries with data for 2019.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.