CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average was 3.36 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▼ Falling
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income, 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income is 3.36 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.4% on the previous year and down 3.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income peaked at 3.63 1=low to 6=high in 2010 and was at its lowest, 3.34 1=low to 6=high, in 2024.
That places Upper middle income 5th out of 42 groups with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 21 years of available data.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.49 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.46 1=low to 6=high | -1.1% |
| 2007 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | +3.0% |
| 2008 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 3.61 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2010 | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 3.56 1=low to 6=high | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 3.54 1=low to 6=high | -0.1% |
| 2014 | 3.48 1=low to 6=high | -1.6% |
| 2015 | 3.47 1=low to 6=high | -0.4% |
| 2016 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | -0.5% |
| 2017 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.48 1=low to 6=high | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2023 | 3.46 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | -3.5% |
| 2025 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.46 1=low to 6=high | 3.61 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.44 1=low to 6=high | 3.63 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 3.34 1=low to 6=high | 3.48 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 2 Cape Verde 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Georgia 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 2 Samoa 4 1=low to 6=high compare
- 5 Rwanda 3.9 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Côte d'Ivoire 3.8 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Armenia 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Benin 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Ghana 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kenya 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kosovo 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Saint Lucia 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Tonga 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Uzbekistan 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Upper middle income
- Population growth 0.3% (2025)
- Population, total 3.08 billion (2025)
- Urban population growth 0.9% (2025)
- Urban population 2.10 billion (2025)
- Urban population 68.2% (2025)
- Population in urban agglomerations of more than 1 million 30.0% (2025)
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total 1,646 billion cubic meters (2022)
- Annual freshwater withdrawals, total 8.9% (2022)
- Terrestrial protected areas 16.2% (2025)
- Terrestrial and marine protected areas 12.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Upper middle income was 3.36 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 3.63 1=low to 6=high in 2010.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.34 1=low to 6=high in 2024.
- How does Upper middle income rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Upper middle income ranks 5th out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 3.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.