Cape Verde vs Upper middle income: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average over time
- Cape Verde
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income, a difference of 0.64 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.2 times Upper middle income's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 2nd and Upper middle income ranks 5th of 84 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.96 1=low to 6=high | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 0.4146 1=low to 6=high | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.98 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.479 1=low to 6=high | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 4.03 1=low to 6=high | 3.43 1=low to 6=high | 0.6079 1=low to 6=high | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Cape Verde or Upper middle income?
- Cape Verde, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.36 1=low to 6=high in Upper middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Cape Verde and Upper middle income?
- 0.64 1=low to 6=high, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Upper middle income?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Upper middle income rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Cape Verde ranks 2nd and Upper middle income ranks 5th of 84 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.