CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Kosovo
Kosovo: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) was 3.7 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▲ Rising
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kosovo, 2009–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kosovo is 3.7 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2025. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of up 2.8% on the previous year and up 12.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kosovo peaked at 3.7 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 3.2 1=low to 6=high, in 2009.
That places Kosovo 7th out of 85 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Kosovo, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +3.0% |
| 2013 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -2.9% |
| 2016 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +3.0% |
| 2022 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | +2.9% |
| 2024 | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | +2.9% |
| 2025 | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | +2.8% |
Kosovo compared with similar countries
- Kosovo's 3.7 1=low to 6=high is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.4 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (21 countries reporting)
- Kosovo's 3.7 1=low to 6=high is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3.3 1=low to 6=high, 1.1× the median. (9 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 1 |
| 2010s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.48 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Kosovo
- 5 Rwanda 3.9 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Cote d'Ivoire 3.8 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Armenia 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Benin 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Ghana 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kenya 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Saint Lucia 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Tonga 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Uzbekistan 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for Kosovo
- Population growth -1.1% (2025)
- Population, total 1.58 million (2025)
- Urban population growth 0.1% (2025)
- Urban population 803,041 (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.5093 units per person (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0922 % change on previous year (2025)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate -1.1 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population 50.9% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kosovo?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Kosovo was 3.7 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Kosovo?
- The highest recorded value was 3.7 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Kosovo?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.2 1=low to 6=high in 2009.
- How does Kosovo rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Kosovo ranks 7th out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Kosovo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kosovo data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.