CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in IBRD only
IBRD only: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2019. ▬ Flat
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in IBRD only, 2005–2019
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in IBRD only is 3.3 1=low to 6=high, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in IBRD only peaked at 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2013 and was at its lowest, 3.29 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
IBRD only ranks 6th of 42 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | -0.9% |
| 2007 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | +2.1% |
| 2008 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.6% |
| 2009 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | -0.3% |
| 2011 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.2% |
| 2012 | 3.39 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2015 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | -1.5% |
| 2019 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 5 Rwanda 3.9 1=low to 6=high compare
- 6 Cote d'Ivoire 3.8 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Armenia 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Benin 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Ghana 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kenya 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kosovo 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Saint Lucia 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Tonga 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Uzbekistan 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
- 7 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 3.7 1=low to 6=high compare
More climate change data for IBRD only
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population 2.94 billion (2025)
- Urban population growth 1.1% (2025)
- Population, total 5.01 billion (2025)
- Population growth 0.5% (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 0.5474 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.5865 units per person (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 1.1 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per square kilometre 40.6 units per square kilometre (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in IBRD only?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in IBRD only was 3.3 1=low to 6=high in 2019, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2013.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.29 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does IBRD only rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- IBRD only ranks 6th out of 42 groups with data for 2019.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.