CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2025. ▬ Flat
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 2005–2025
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 1=low to 6=high.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) recorded 3.4 1=low to 6=high for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in 2025. That is the highest value across all 21 years on record.
The figure is up 1.5% on the previous year and up 6.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2025 and was at its lowest, 3.12 1=low to 6=high, in 2006.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st of 42 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | 1=low to 6=high | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 3.15 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2006 | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | -1.0% |
| 2007 | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | +1.4% |
| 2008 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | +2.0% |
| 2009 | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2010 | 3.24 1=low to 6=high | +0.3% |
| 2011 | 3.29 1=low to 6=high | +1.3% |
| 2012 | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | +2.3% |
| 2013 | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 3.22 1=low to 6=high | -4.6% |
| 2015 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | -0.6% |
| 2016 | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | -0.6% |
| 2017 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.6% |
| 2018 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2021 | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | +3.9% |
| 2022 | 3.27 1=low to 6=high | -0.8% |
| 2023 | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | +1.5% |
| 2024 | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | +0.8% |
| 2025 | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | +1.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 3.23 1=low to 6=high | 5 |
| 2010s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.18 1=low to 6=high | 3.38 1=low to 6=high | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 6 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
More climate change data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Population, total, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population 173.06 million (2025)
- Urban population growth 1.2% (2025)
- Population, total 253.28 million (2025)
- Population growth 1.1% (2025)
- Population, total, annual growth rate 1.15 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Urban population, per capita 0.6833 units per person (2025)
- Urban population, annual growth rate 1.24 % change on previous year (2025)
- Urban population, per square kilometre 28.7 units per square kilometre (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2025, according to CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 3.4 1=low to 6=high in 2025.
- What is the lowest cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.12 1=low to 6=high in 2006.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st out of 42 groups with data for 2025.
- Is cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 21 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.