Bangladesh vs Central African Republic: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average over time
- Bangladesh
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.4 1=low to 6=high in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 70th and Central African Republic ranks 71st of 85 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.94 1=low to 6=high | 2.28 1=low to 6=high | 0.66 1=low to 6=high | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 2.83 1=low to 6=high | 2.34 1=low to 6=high | 0.49 1=low to 6=high | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 2.55 1=low to 6=high | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.15 1=low to 6=high | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Bangladesh or Central African Republic?
- Bangladesh, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.4 1=low to 6=high in Central African Republic as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Bangladesh and Central African Republic?
- 0.1 1=low to 6=high, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Central African Republic?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Central African Republic rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Bangladesh ranks 70th and Central African Republic ranks 71st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.