East Asia & Pacific vs Fiji: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Fiji
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 3.3 1=low to 6=high against 2.98 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.32 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Fiji has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Fiji ranks 23rd of 42 groups.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, East Asia & Pacific or Fiji?
- Fiji, at 3.3 1=low to 6=high against 2.98 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between East Asia & Pacific and Fiji?
- 0.32 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Fiji?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Fiji rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 21st and Fiji ranks 23rd of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.