Fiji vs Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income): CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average over time
- Fiji
- Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 3.3 1=low to 6=high against 2.97 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income), a difference of 0.33 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Fiji's figure about 1.1 times Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ahead.
Fiji ranks 23rd and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 85 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Fiji or Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- Fiji, at 3.3 1=low to 6=high against 2.97 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Fiji and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- 0.33 1=low to 6=high, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Fiji ranks 23rd and Latin America & Caribbean (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.