Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Uzbekistan: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low)
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 3.7 1=low to 6=high against 3.7 1=low to 6=high in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.4 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2010s | 3.32 1=low to 6=high | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 0.24 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) |
| 2020s | 3.48 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Uzbekistan?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 3.7 1=low to 6=high against 3.7 1=low to 6=high in Uzbekistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Uzbekistan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Uzbekistan rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 7th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.