Kyrgyzstan vs Least developed countries: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low)
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Least developed countries
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 3.1 1=low to 6=high against 2.67 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.43 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Least developed countries's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Least developed countries ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th and Least developed countries ranks 36th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Least developed countries in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Least developed countries | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.0217 1=low to 6=high | Least developed countries |
| 2010s | 3.14 1=low to 6=high | 2.86 1=low to 6=high | 0.2757 1=low to 6=high | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 3.08 1=low to 6=high | 2.72 1=low to 6=high | 0.3676 1=low to 6=high | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Kyrgyzstan or Least developed countries?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 3.1 1=low to 6=high against 2.67 1=low to 6=high in Least developed countries as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Kyrgyzstan and Least developed countries?
- 0.43 1=low to 6=high, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Least developed countries?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Least developed countries rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th and Least developed countries ranks 36th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.