Latin America & Caribbean vs Sri Lanka: CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average over time
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 3.4 1=low to 6=high against 2.99 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0.41 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Latin America & Caribbean's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 20th of 42 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latin America & Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latin America & Caribbean | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.0156 1=low to 6=high | Latin America & Caribbean |
| 2010s | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 3.36 1=low to 6=high | 0.0065 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.07 1=low to 6=high | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 0.2819 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average, Latin America & Caribbean or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 3.4 1=low to 6=high against 2.99 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average between Latin America & Caribbean and Sri Lanka?
- 0.41 1=low to 6=high, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Latin America & Caribbean and Sri Lanka rank globally for cpia public sector management and institutions cluster average?
- Latin America & Caribbean ranks 18th and Sri Lanka ranks 20th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The Public Sector Management and Institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.